<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Table Of Contents Discussion Resumed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackadelic.com/table-of-contents-discussion-resumed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackadelic.com/table-of-contents-discussion-resumed</link>
	<description>Think More, Code Less! - Intelligent WordPress Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:51:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hackadelic</title>
		<link>http://hackadelic.com/table-of-contents-discussion-resumed/comment-page-1#comment-5578</link>
		<dc:creator>Hackadelic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 20:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadelic.com/?p=523#comment-5578</guid>
		<description>Jim, I do value performance, but I wouldn&#039;t say it&#039;s the &lt;strong&gt;most&lt;/strong&gt; important thing about a website. Page loading needs to be fast enough, but not faster. Beyond that, sacrificing flexibility for speed makes no sense.

It is true that WP&#039;s plugin load mechanism imposes some overhead,  but alas, many plugins (and themes) suffer from performance problems because of the way they are coded in the first place.

I do strive for the most simple solutions, both with the plugins I implement and those I choose to use on my blog, so I can probably afford to have a few plugins more ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, I do value performance, but I wouldn&#8217;t say it&#8217;s the <strong>most</strong> important thing about a website. Page loading needs to be fast enough, but not faster. Beyond that, sacrificing flexibility for speed makes no sense.</p>
<p>It is true that WP&#8217;s plugin load mechanism imposes some overhead,  but alas, many plugins (and themes) suffer from performance problems because of the way they are coded in the first place.</p>
<p>I do strive for the most simple solutions, both with the plugins I implement and those I choose to use on my blog, so I can probably afford to have a few plugins more <img src='http://hackadelic.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://hackadelic.com/table-of-contents-discussion-resumed/comment-page-1#comment-5557</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 07:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadelic.com/?p=523#comment-5557</guid>
		<description>IN a more general sense, plug-ins do slow Wordpress down, which constrains their utility since I hazard the opinion that speed is absolutely the most important thing about a website.  No one is going to read a website that is slow, and slow is something less than 3-5 seconds IMHO.

At the same time, plug-ins are preferable to hard coding in that they are transportable across themes.  So most users must prioritize the plug-ins they use.  I hazard to guess that is why we see relatively few Table of Contents on sites.

I read an interesting discussion about conditionally loading plug-in code &lt;a&gt;from Beer Planet&lt;/a&gt; showing a couple ways to avoid load bloat as well as ensuring that code doesn&#039;t get loaded twice.

I hope it&#039;s germane to your discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IN a more general sense, plug-ins do slow WordPress down, which constrains their utility since I hazard the opinion that speed is absolutely the most important thing about a website.  No one is going to read a website that is slow, and slow is something less than 3-5 seconds IMHO.</p>
<p>At the same time, plug-ins are preferable to hard coding in that they are transportable across themes.  So most users must prioritize the plug-ins they use.  I hazard to guess that is why we see relatively few Table of Contents on sites.</p>
<p>I read an interesting discussion about conditionally loading plug-in code <a>from Beer Planet</a> showing a couple ways to avoid load bloat as well as ensuring that code doesn&#8217;t get loaded twice.</p>
<p>I hope it&#8217;s germane to your discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

