<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: URL Shortening Harmful, Use URL Masking / Cloaking Software Instead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hackadelic.com/url-shortening-harmful-use-url-masking-cloaking-software-instead/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hackadelic.com/url-shortening-harmful-use-url-masking-cloaking-software-instead</link>
	<description>Think More, Code Less! - Intelligent WordPress Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:08:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hackadelic</title>
		<link>http://hackadelic.com/url-shortening-harmful-use-url-masking-cloaking-software-instead/comment-page-1#comment-5284</link>
		<dc:creator>Hackadelic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 10:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadelic.com/?p=505#comment-5284</guid>
		<description>Hello Ari,

good points. You may be interested in a &quot;personal&quot; shortener then. They provide a short URL path, but start at your own domain. So instead of &quot;thingly.me/b17fe8&quot; your get &quot;yourdoman.com/b17fe8&quot;. Of course, if your domain is longish by itself, the shortening will be less effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Ari,</p>
<p>good points. You may be interested in a &#8220;personal&#8221; shortener then. They provide a short URL path, but start at your own domain. So instead of &#8220;thingly.me/b17fe8&#8243; your get &#8220;yourdoman.com/b17fe8&#8243;. Of course, if your domain is longish by itself, the shortening will be less effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari Goldstein</title>
		<link>http://hackadelic.com/url-shortening-harmful-use-url-masking-cloaking-software-instead/comment-page-1#comment-5277</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari Goldstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 05:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadelic.com/?p=505#comment-5277</guid>
		<description>I think you bring up some valid points and a decent solution. The comment:

&quot;I can think of only one logical reason to use an URL shortener in the own blog: To cloak a link the target of which you don’t want to be immediately visible to the reader (an affiliate link, for example).&quot;

I would tend to agree with this only as a partial demographic. Outside of limited 140 char sets for a Twitter entry, I personally shorten for one of two purposes:
1) in order to allow the end user to easily transcribe from mobile device to workstation browsers
2) in order to avoid a line break in a link sent via email, where the end user is too confused to understand the issue of the &#039;broken link&#039;

I also think that a URL shortening service is a way to hide the originating URL server, but for me, I do not use them to hide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you bring up some valid points and a decent solution. The comment:</p>
<p>&#8220;I can think of only one logical reason to use an URL shortener in the own blog: To cloak a link the target of which you don’t want to be immediately visible to the reader (an affiliate link, for example).&#8221;</p>
<p>I would tend to agree with this only as a partial demographic. Outside of limited 140 char sets for a Twitter entry, I personally shorten for one of two purposes:<br />
1) in order to allow the end user to easily transcribe from mobile device to workstation browsers<br />
2) in order to avoid a line break in a link sent via email, where the end user is too confused to understand the issue of the &#8216;broken link&#8217;</p>
<p>I also think that a URL shortening service is a way to hide the originating URL server, but for me, I do not use them to hide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ipstenu</title>
		<link>http://hackadelic.com/url-shortening-harmful-use-url-masking-cloaking-software-instead/comment-page-1#comment-5057</link>
		<dc:creator>Ipstenu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackadelic.com/?p=505#comment-5057</guid>
		<description>This is why I prefer to use my own short URL (the &#039;ugly&#039; URL) for WordPress and Twitter.  Keeps MY branding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why I prefer to use my own short URL (the &#8216;ugly&#8217; URL) for WordPress and Twitter.  Keeps MY branding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
